道 Dao Knowledge Base

Measuring Meditation's Harms in Mindfulness Programs (Britton 2021)

The study that gave meditation's adverse effects a measurement instrument: 58% of MBSR/MBCT participants reported at least one adverse effect — and what that does and does not say about Daoist sitting.

MODERN RESEARCH

The question

How common are meditation’s harms when someone actually measures them? The Farias 2020 review showed the literature under-reports adverse effects; this study is the measurement-instrument answer — the first standardized tool (the MRAES-MBP) applied to three mindfulness-based programs.

The study

Findings (as stated by the authors)

What it does NOT say

Why it is here

The site’s safety pages — can sitting go wrong? and zuowang safety without a teacher — need the strongest available numbers behind their caution, and this study is the methodological ceiling of the harms literature. The varieties-of-experience study supplies the qualitative side.

Sources